Chlamydia trachomatis is a human pathogen associated with significant morbidity worldwide. As obligate intracellular parasites, chlamydiae must survive within eukaryotic cells for sufficient time to complete their developmental cycle. To promote host cell survival, chlamydiae express poorly understood anti-apoptotic factors. Using recently developed genetic tools, we show that three inclusion membrane proteins (Incs) out of eleven examined are required for inclusion membrane stability and avoidance of host cell death pathways. In the absence of specific Incs, premature inclusion lysis results in recognition by autophagolysosomes, activation of intrinsic apoptosis, and premature termination of the chlamydial developmental cycle. Inhibition of autophagy or knockdown of STING prevented host cell death and activation of intrinsic apoptosis. Significantly, these findings emphasize the importance of Incs in the establishment of a replicative compartment that sequesters the pathogen from host surveillance systems.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#7,025,394
of 33,779,198 outputs
Outputs from Cell Reports
#9,813
of 16,646 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,272
of 353,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Reports
#169
of 242 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,779,198 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,646 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,569 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 242 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
