↓ Skip to main content

Quantifying Information Flow During Emergencies

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
46 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
176 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantifying Information Flow During Emergencies
Published in
Scientific Reports, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/srep03997
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Recent advances on human dynamics have focused on the normal patterns of human activities, with the quantitative understanding of human behavior under extreme events remaining a crucial missing chapter. This has a wide array of potential applications, ranging from emergency response and detection to traffic control and management. Previous studies have shown that human communications are both temporally and spatially localized following the onset of emergencies, indicating that social propagation is a primary means to propagate situational awareness. We study real anomalous events using country-wide mobile phone data, finding that information flow during emergencies is dominated by repeated communications. We further demonstrate that the observed communication patterns cannot be explained by inherent reciprocity in social networks, and are universal across different demographics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 46 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 176 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
Brazil 2 1%
Taiwan 1 <1%
Saudi Arabia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Sri Lanka 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 163 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 22%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Master 16 9%
Other 12 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 45 26%
Unknown 26 15%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 30 17%
Physics and Astronomy 22 13%
Social Sciences 16 9%
Engineering 13 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 6%
Other 53 30%
Unknown 32 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 50. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#1,040,806
of 32,973,893 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#10,887
of 178,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,759
of 364,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#47
of 716 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,973,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178,744 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,187 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 716 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.