↓ Skip to main content

Optimal voting schemes with costly information acquisition

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Economic Theory, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
82 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Optimal voting schemes with costly information acquisition
Published in
Journal of Economic Theory, January 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jet.2008.02.004
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Japan 1 1%
Hungary 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 74 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 43%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 4 5%
Other 9 11%
Unknown 11 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 45 55%
Social Sciences 10 12%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Environmental Science 1 1%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 18 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2025.
All research outputs
#10,870,676
of 31,733,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Economic Theory
#736
of 1,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,957
of 230,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Economic Theory
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,733,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,917 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.