↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Loss of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity in the frontal cortex of Alzheimer patients carrying the apolipoprotein epsilon 4 allele
Published in
Neuroscience Letters, October 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0304-3940(98)00698-3
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We measured somatostatin-like immunoreactivity, using a radioimmunoassay which does not cross react with cortistatin-like immunoreactivity, in postmortem frontal cortex (Brodmann area 9) from 32 patients, of different apolipoprotein E genotypes, and presenting with different degrees of cognitive impairment. Eleven subjects and eight patients presented with no (controls) or limited memory impairments (Borderline), respectively. Six patients with clinical criteria for possible Alzheimer's disease also presented with clinical or brain imaging of cerebrovascular disease (mixed dementia) and seven patients were classified as Alzheimer's disease (AD). In the 6 months preceeding their deaths, all subjects had been evaluated by Folstein's Mini Mental State examination (MMS). Sixty nine percent of patients with MMS >20 did not carry the epsilon 4 allele while 66% of patients with MMS <10 did. Somatostatin concentrations (ng/mg wet weight) were significantly lower in the patients carrying the epsilon 4 allele (E2/3: 0.71 +/- 0.05, n = 19 vs. E4: 0.42 +/- 0.06, n = 13; mean +/- SEM, P < 0.001). These results, which are reminiscent of those obtained on cholinergic markers, suggest that apolipoprotein E4 is involved in the somatostatinergic dysfunction early after the onset in AD.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
Unknown 56 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 23%
Researcher 9 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 14%
Unknown 9 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 28%
Neuroscience 11 19%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Psychology 2 4%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 11 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2011.
All research outputs
#7,646,787
of 28,840,878 outputs
Outputs from Neuroscience Letters
#2,012
of 8,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,606
of 37,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroscience Letters
#9
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,840,878 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,024 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 37,408 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.