↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of large bowel fermentation on insulin, glucose, free fatty acids, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide in patients with coronary heart disease
Published in
Nutrition, March 1999
DOI 10.1016/s0899-9007(98)00177-4
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Insulin resistance syndrome has recently been described as a unifying hypothesis to explain the relationship between the many risk factors of coronary heart disease. Carbohydrate that is malabsorbed and fermented in the colon has been demonstrated to decrease insulin response to a glucose load and improve other risk factors associated with coronary heart disease, although the mechanism remains unclear. The object of the present study was to investigate whether this observation could be explained by the production of fermentation products induced by malabsorbed carbohydrate in the colon, or by stimulating the incretin glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide that is released from the large bowel. We used lactulose as a model for resistant starch carbohydrate. Ten insulin-resistant male volunteers, who had undergone previous coronary artery bypass grafting, volunteered to take part in the study and underwent 6 d of lactulose loading (15 g/d for 2 d and 30 g/d for 4 d). There was no significant change in insulin, glucose, free fatty acids, or glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) amide response to an oral glucose tolerance test following the lactulose despite a significant rise in breath hydrogen. Large bowel fermentation stimulated by lactulose appears to have no significant effect on insulin, glucose, free fatty acids, and glucagon-like peptide 1 (7-36) response in patients with coronary heart disease.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Other 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Researcher 1 8%
Other 2 15%
Unknown 3 23%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 15%
Materials Science 1 8%
Chemistry 1 8%
Unknown 4 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2013.
All research outputs
#4,551,447
of 30,096,795 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition
#965
of 3,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,316
of 43,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition
#4
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,096,795 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,762 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.