↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
9 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Quantitative autoradiography of adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains and spinal cords of mice deficient in the μ-opioid receptor gene
Published in
Brain Research, July 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0006-8993(02)02536-2
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

There is a large body of evidence indicating important interactions between the adenosine and opioid systems in regulating pain at both the spinal and supraspinal level. Mice lacking the mu-opioid receptor (MOR) gene have been successfully developed and the animals show complete loss of analgesic responses to morphine as well as differences in pain sensitivity. To investigate if there are any compensatory alterations in adenosine systems in mutant animals, we have carried out quantitative autoradiographic mapping of A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and nitrobenzylthioinosine (NBTI) sensitive adenosine transporters in the brains and spinal cords of wild type, heterozygous and homozygous mu-opioid receptor knockout mice. Adjacent coronal sections were cut from the brains and spinal cords of +/+, +/- and -/- mice for the determination of binding of [3H]DPCPX, [3H]CGS21680 or [3H]NBTI to A(1) and A(2A) adenosine receptors and NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters, respectively. A small but significant reduction in [3H]DPCPX and [3H]NBTI binding was detected in mutant mice brains but not in spinal cords. No significant change in A(2A) binding was detected in mu-opioid receptor knockout brains. The results suggest there may be functional interactions between mu-receptors and A(1) adenosine receptors as well as NBTI-sensitive adenosine transporters in the brain but not in the spinal cord.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 11%
Unknown 8 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 11%
Professor 1 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 11%
Student > Master 1 11%
Other 1 11%
Unknown 3 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 22%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 11%
Neuroscience 1 11%
Unknown 4 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#4,678,750
of 31,591,940 outputs
Outputs from Brain Research
#952
of 10,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,455
of 63,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brain Research
#2
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 31,591,940 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,777 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 63,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.