↓ Skip to main content

Putting knowledge to work: A new approach

Overview of attention for article published in Nurse Education Today, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
170 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Putting knowledge to work: A new approach
Published in
Nurse Education Today, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.nedt.2009.10.014
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Approaches to the longstanding challenges of 'integrating' subject-based and work-based knowledge have typically focused on questions of how learning can be 'transferred' from one setting to another, relating the assumed 'abstract' nature of theory to the assumed 'real' nature of practice. This is often seen as a single movement as encapsulated in the term 'from theory to practice'. The authors have developed a fresh approach that concentrates on different forms of knowledge and the ways in which these are contextualised and 're-contextualised' in movements between different sites of learning in colleges and workplaces. While the research has been carried out in a range of professional fields outside nursing, the arguments put forward by the authors are relevant to continuing debates within nursing around the theory-practice gap. The aim has been to explore how the subject-based and work-based aspects of a curriculum or learning programme can articulate with one another more effectively. The potential of the 're-contextualisation' approach for nurse education is outlined, with a view to further research. The original research was sponsored by the London Chamber of Commerce and Industry Commercial Education Trust and the Economic and Social Research Council Teaching and Learning Research Programme.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 170 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 2%
Portugal 3 2%
Singapore 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 159 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 12%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Researcher 10 6%
Other 47 28%
Unknown 34 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 13 8%
Arts and Humanities 11 6%
Other 29 17%
Unknown 37 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 April 2018.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Nurse Education Today
#2,246
of 2,573 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,682
of 176,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nurse Education Today
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,573 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.