↓ Skip to main content

Estimation of abdominal fat compartments by bioelectrical impedance: the validity of the ViScan measurement system in comparison with MRI

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Estimation of abdominal fat compartments by bioelectrical impedance: the validity of the ViScan measurement system in comparison with MRI
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 2010
DOI 10.1038/ejcn.2010.18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Spain 1 1%
Denmark 1 1%
Unknown 74 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 13%
Researcher 9 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 10%
Other 7 9%
Other 21 27%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 32 42%
Engineering 6 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#2,171
of 3,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,013
of 96,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,870 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.