↓ Skip to main content

Role of Mycobacterium tuberculosisCopper-Zinc Superoxide Dismutase

Overview of attention for article published in Infection and Immunity, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
5 patents

Readers on

mendeley
78 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Role of Mycobacterium tuberculosisCopper-Zinc Superoxide Dismutase
Published in
Infection and Immunity, January 2001
DOI 10.1128/iai.69.1.529-533.2001
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Superoxide dismutases (SODs) play an important role in protection against oxidative stress and have been shown to contribute to the pathogenicity of many bacterial species. To determine the function of the mycobacterial copper and zinc-cofactored SOD (CuZnSOD), we constructed and characterized Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium bovis BCG CuZnSOD null mutants. Both strains were more sensitive to superoxides and hydrogen peroxide than were their respective parental strains. The survival of M. bovis BCG in unstimulated as well as activated mouse bone marrow-derived macrophages was not affected by the loss of CuZnSOD. The survival of CuZnSOD deficient-M. tuberculosis in guinea pig tissues was comparable to that of its parental strain. These results indicate that the mycobacterial CuZnSOD is not essential for intracellular growth within macrophages and does not detectably contribute to the pathogenicity of M. tuberculosis.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Kenya 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 75 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 10%
Student > Master 7 9%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 15 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 24 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 15%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 18 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2011.
All research outputs
#4,580,084
of 30,539,290 outputs
Outputs from Infection and Immunity
#1,078
of 14,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,044
of 134,841 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection and Immunity
#13
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,539,290 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,132 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 134,841 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.