↓ Skip to main content

Mechanism of the protective action of n-acetylcysteine and methionine against paracetamol toxicity in the hamster

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, August 1985
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Mechanism of the protective action of n-acetylcysteine and methionine against paracetamol toxicity in the hamster
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, August 1985
DOI 10.1007/bf00290883
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suzanne Pratt, Costas Ioannides

Abstract

The mechanism of the protective action of methionine and N-acetylcysteine against the toxicity of paracetamol was investigated in vivo. N-acetylcysteine inhibited the O-deethylation of ethoxyresorufin (cytochrome P-448) while methionine enhanced the N-demethylation of benzphetamine (cytochrome P-450) and increased hepatic microsomal levels of cytochrome P-450. These observations indicate that N-acetylcysteine, but not methionine, could afford protection against paracetamol hepatotoxicity, at least partly, by inhibiting cytochrome P-448 activity and thus the generation of the reactive intermediate. However, previous studies demonstrating no decrease in the urinary excretion of glutathione conjugates of paracetamol (derived from the reactive intermediate) in animals treated with N-acetylcysteine suggest that this is unlikely to be the prevailing mechanism of action. Administration of a large dose of paracetamol, as expected, depleted glutathione levels and inhibited cytosolic glutathione transferase activity. Administration of either N-acetylcysteine or methionine 1 h after paracetamol prevented both effects. On the basis of the present work and previously published observations, it is concluded that the major mechanism of action of N-acetylcysteine and methionine in vivo is by acting as precursors of intracellular glutathione.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 20 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 15%
Student > Bachelor 2 10%
Student > Master 2 10%
Researcher 2 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Other 4 20%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Chemical Engineering 1 5%
Environmental Science 1 5%
Other 2 10%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2018.
All research outputs
#17,284,057
of 25,382,360 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#2,129
of 2,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,651
of 9,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 9,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.