↓ Skip to main content

Women's perceptions of iron deficiency and anemia prevention and control in eight developing countries

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science & Medicine, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
policy
3 policy sources

Readers on

mendeley
518 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Women's perceptions of iron deficiency and anemia prevention and control in eight developing countries
Published in
Social Science & Medicine, August 2002
DOI 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00185-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rae Galloway, Erin Dusch, Leslie Elder, Endang Achadi, Ruben Grajeda, Elena Hurtado, Mike Favin, Shubhada Kanani, Julie Marsaban, Nicolas Meda, K Mona Moore, Linda Morison, Neena Raina, Jolly Rajaratnam, Javier Rodriquez, Chitra Stephen

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 518 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 514 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 17%
Student > Bachelor 60 12%
Lecturer 48 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 8%
Researcher 43 8%
Other 76 15%
Unknown 157 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 103 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 103 20%
Social Sciences 42 8%
Psychology 22 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 4%
Other 57 11%
Unknown 170 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,163,142
of 29,597,885 outputs
Outputs from Social Science & Medicine
#1,078
of 12,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#957
of 56,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science & Medicine
#3
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 29,597,885 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,971 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 56,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.