↓ Skip to main content

Nutritional genomics

Overview of attention for article published in British Medical Journal, June 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
citeulike
5 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nutritional genomics
Published in
British Medical Journal, June 2002
DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7351.1438
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ruan Elliott, Teng Jin Ong

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 18%
Professor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Researcher 3 7%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 18 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 18 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2023.
All research outputs
#24,228,000
of 34,517,289 outputs
Outputs from British Medical Journal
#62,666
of 75,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,393
of 176,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Medical Journal
#212
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,517,289 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 75,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,644 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.