↓ Skip to main content

Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)-dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
27 patents

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Rv3615c is a highly immunodominant RD1 (Region of Difference 1)-dependent secreted antigen specific for Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, March 2011
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1015153108
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
South Africa 2 1%
Spain 2 1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 147 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 21%
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Student > Master 11 7%
Other 23 15%
Unknown 34 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 31%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 8%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 5 3%
Other 15 10%
Unknown 36 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2026.
All research outputs
#2,948,542
of 34,400,738 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#32,687
of 118,992 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,142
of 161,614 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#187
of 762 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,400,738 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 118,992 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 161,614 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 762 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.