↓ Skip to main content

Cancer-related fatigue: Inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Oncology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

guideline
3 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
166 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cancer-related fatigue: Inevitable, unimportant and untreatable? Results of a multi-centre patient survey
Published in
Annals of Oncology, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1008318932641
Pubmed ID
Authors

P. Stone, A. Richardson, E. Ream, A.G. Smith, D.J. Kerr, N. Kearney, on behalf of the Cancer Fatigue Forum

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 166 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 161 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 13%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Postgraduate 13 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 24 14%
Unknown 55 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Psychology 17 10%
Sports and Recreations 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 59 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,272,596
of 28,171,938 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#2,596
of 8,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,657
of 43,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#4
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,171,938 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 43,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.