↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of carprofen and flunixin meglumine asadjunctive therapy in bovine respiratory disease

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Journal, November 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparison of carprofen and flunixin meglumine asadjunctive therapy in bovine respiratory disease
Published in
Veterinary Journal, November 1997
DOI 10.1016/s1090-0233(97)80028-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

T.V. Balmer, P. Williams, I.E. Selman

Abstract

In an open, controlled, multi-centre clinical field trial, seven 'naturally occurring' outbreaks of acute febrile (rectal temperature > or = 39.5 degrees C) respiratory disease in housed calves were treated with a single antimicrobial agent, and either the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) carprofen (n = 95) or flunixin meglumine (n = 92) on an alternate basis. Carprofen was administered as a single subcutaneous injection at a mean dosage of 1.4 mg kg-1 (range 1.2 to 1.9 mg kg-1) body weight on the first day and flunixin meglumine by intravenous injection at a mean dosage of 2.0 mg kg-1 (range 1.2 to 2.6 mg kg-1) body weight on the first 3 consecutive days. All calves were examined clinically immediately prior to initial treatment and on three occasions up to 1 week after the end of treatment. There were no statically significant differences between NSAID groups in reduction of clinical parameters between examinations, or in overall efficacy. This trial demonstrated that a single dose of carprofen was equally effective as three daily doses of flunixin meglumine as adjunctive therapy to antimicrobial treatment in acute respiratory disease in calves.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
New Zealand 1 3%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 30 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Researcher 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 6 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 47%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 4 12%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Unknown 7 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2018.
All research outputs
#10,782,638
of 34,518,147 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Journal
#679
of 2,745 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,479
of 44,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Journal
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,518,147 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,745 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them