↓ Skip to main content

A cone-beam megavoltage CT scanner for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Radiotherapy & Oncology, September 1998
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
35 patents

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A cone-beam megavoltage CT scanner for treatment verification in conformal radiotherapy
Published in
Radiotherapy & Oncology, September 1998
DOI 10.1016/s0167-8140(98)00042-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A prototype scanner for large-volume megavoltage computed tomography (MVCT) in a clinical set-up is described. The ultimate aim is to improve treatment accuracy in conformal radiotherapy through patient set-up error reduction and transit dosimetry. The scanner consists of a custom-built 2D CsI(Tl) crystal array viewed by a lens and a CCD camera. Image acquisition is synchronized with radiation pulses. The 2D projections resulting from a single continuous 360 degrees gantry rotation are reconstructed using a cone-beam tomography algorithm. Prior to reconstruction, the raw projections are calibrated and corrected for centre of rotation movement and accelerator output fluctuation. The performance of the system has been evaluated by reconstructing projections of open fields, test objects and a humanoid phantom. Hundreds of 2D projections can be acquired with a clinically-acceptable data collection time (about 2 min) and dose (approximately 40 cGy, with a possible four-fold reduction). A maximum density resolution of about 2% is achieved offering some soft tissue discrimination without using image enhancement tools. A spatial resolution of 2.5 mm is obtained. The reconstructed image intensity is linear with electron density over the range of interest. Coronal or sagittal slices through the 3D reconstruction of the humanoid phantom show a better delineation of structures than the corresponding portal images taken at the same orientation. A similar image quality to our current single-slice MVCT scanner is achieved with the advantage of providing tens of tomographic slices for a single gantry rotation. This work demonstrates the feasibility of clinical cone-beam MVCT and indicates how this prototype can be improved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 3%
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Researcher 7 19%
Other 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 7 19%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 17 46%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Engineering 4 11%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2024.
All research outputs
#12,344,681
of 34,362,729 outputs
Outputs from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#2,757
of 6,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,454
of 46,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiotherapy & Oncology
#6
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,362,729 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,400 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 46,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.