↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Whole body magnetic resonance imaging in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: early changes in lesional signal fat fraction predict disease response
Published in
British Journal of Haematology, October 2016
DOI 10.1111/bjh.14401
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cross-sectional imaging techniques are being increasingly used for disease evaluation in patients with multiple myeloma. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) scanning is superior to plain radiography in baseline assessment of patients but changes following treatment have not been systematically explored. We carried out paired WB-MRI scans in 21 newly diagnosed patients prior to, and 8-weeks after, starting chemotherapy, and analysed stringently selected focal lesions (FLs) for parametric changes. A total of 323 FLs were evaluated, median 20 per patient. At 8 weeks, there was a reduction in estimated tumour volume (eTV), and an increase in signal fat fraction (sFF) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the group as a whole (P < 0·001). Patients who achieved complete/very good partial response (CR/VGPR) to induction had a significantly greater increase in sFF compared to those achieving ≤ partial response (PR; P = 0·001). When analysed on a per-patient basis, all patients achieving CR/VGPR had a significant sFF increase in their FL's, in contrast to patients achieving ≤PR. sFF changes in patients reaching maximal response within 100 days (fast responders) were greater compared to slow responders (P = 0·001). Receiver Operator Characteristic analysis indicated that sFF changes at 8 weeks were the best biomarker (area under the Curve 0·95) for an inferior response (≤PR). We conclude that early lesional sFF changes may provide important information on depth of response, and are worthy of further prospective study.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 81 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 13 16%
Researcher 12 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Master 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 16 20%
Unknown 25 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 38 47%
Engineering 4 5%
Unspecified 2 2%
Arts and Humanities 1 1%
Computer Science 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 32 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#19,869,877
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Haematology
#6,757
of 7,879 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,695
of 321,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Haematology
#60
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,879 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,476 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.