↓ Skip to main content

Corticosterone oscillations during mania induction in the lateral hypothalamic kindled rat—Experimental observations and mathematical modeling

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Corticosterone oscillations during mania induction in the lateral hypothalamic kindled rat—Experimental observations and mathematical modeling
Published in
PLOS ONE, May 2017
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0177551
Pubmed ID
Authors

Osama A. Abulseoud, Man Choi Ho, Doo-Sup Choi, Ana Stanojević, Željko Čupić, Ljiljana Kolar-Anić, Vladana Vukojević

Abstract

Changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis activity constitute a key component of bipolar mania, but the extent and nature of these alterations are not fully understood. We use here the lateral hypothalamic-kindled (LHK) rat model to deliberately induce an acute manic-like episode and measure serum corticosterone concentrations to assess changes in HPA axis activity. A mathematical model is developed to succinctly describe the entwined biochemical transformations that underlay the HPA axis and emulate by numerical simulations the considerable increase in serum corticosterone concentration induced by LHK. Synergistic combination of the LHK rat model and dynamical systems theory allows us to quantitatively characterize changes in HPA axis activity under controlled induction of acute manic-like states and provides a framework to study in silico how the dynamic integration of neurochemical transformations underlying the HPA axis is disrupted in these states.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Student > Postgraduate 2 12%
Student > Master 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 7 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 2 12%
Engineering 2 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 12%
Chemistry 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#14,283,803
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#117,190
of 195,799 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#173,924
of 313,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,322
of 4,383 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 195,799 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4,383 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.