↓ Skip to main content

Transcriptional Inhibition of Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (SOD2) Gene Expression by DNA Methylation of the 5′ CpG Island

Overview of attention for article published in Free Radical Biology & Medicine, January 1997
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Transcriptional Inhibition of Manganese Superoxide Dismutase (SOD2) Gene Expression by DNA Methylation of the 5′ CpG Island
Published in
Free Radical Biology & Medicine, January 1997
DOI 10.1016/s0891-5849(97)00095-6
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Manganese superoxide dismutase (MnSOD) enzyme activity and SOD2 gene expression have often been reported to decrease during the development of cancer. SOD2 has also been implicated as a candidate tumor suppressor gene for human malignant melanoma. Genomic DNA methylation patterns are also known to change during carcinogenesis and serve as a mechanism for tumor suppressor gene inactivation. We hypothesized that decreased SOD2 gene expression in some malignant cell populations may be due, at least in part, to methylation of upstream transcriptional regulatory sequences in the SOD2 gene. To test this hypothesis we transfected methylated and unmethylated SOD/2-CAT promoter-reporter constructs in cells known to express the SOD2 gene. Our results indicate that methylation of specific cytokines in the SOD2 5' flanking region is sufficient to repress transcriptional activity of the SOD2 promoter by at least 50%. Moreover, we show that this transcriptional repression was likely mediated by inhibition of AP-2 DNA binding and transactivation from a methylated AP-2 binding site in the SOD2 promoter. DNA methylation may provide a mechanism for transcriptional inactivation of the SOD2 gene during the development of some cancers.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 7%
Unknown 14 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 20%
Student > Master 3 20%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Researcher 2 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 13%
Other 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 40%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 20%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 7%
Arts and Humanities 1 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 1 7%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 June 2017.
All research outputs
#21,931,197
of 33,940,276 outputs
Outputs from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#4,556
of 6,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,625
of 122,557 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Free Radical Biology & Medicine
#95
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,940,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,736 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,557 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.