↓ Skip to main content

Graphology and Personality: An Empirical Study on Validity of Handwriting Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Psychological Reports, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#25 of 3,045)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
16 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
74 X users
patent
1 patent
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages
reddit
5 Redditors
video
2 YouTube creators
bluesky
1 Bluesky user
podcasts
1 podcast

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Graphology and Personality: An Empirical Study on Validity of Handwriting Analysis
Published in
Psychological Reports, December 2009
DOI 10.2466/pr0.105.f.1255-1268
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of the present work was to examine validity of the graphological method to assess personality traits. The results of two studies are described. In Study 1, the Big Five Questionnaire was administered to a sample of 101 university students who provided a sample of a handwritten text. Two graphologists were asked to detect the same dimensions and facets measured by the Big Five Questionnaire using a 9-point scale. Correlations between the Big Five Questionnaire and graphological evaluations did not confirm the capability of handwriting analysis to measure Big Five personality traits. Also, interrater reliability was very low. Study 2 (N = 102) was carried out using handwritten texts with autobiographical content for the graphological analysis. Two different graphologists and two laypersons were involved. No evidence was found to validate the graphological method as a measure of personality.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 74 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 77 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 11 14%
Student > Master 9 11%
Researcher 9 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 24 30%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 21 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 6%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 5%
Computer Science 4 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 206. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 October 2026.
All research outputs
#241,268
of 34,599,069 outputs
Outputs from Psychological Reports
#25
of 3,045 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#687
of 240,927 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychological Reports
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,599,069 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,045 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,927 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.