How can we value what is not measured: the need for better data on women's health and primary care.

Overview of attention for article published in New Zealand Medical Journal, August 2026

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

news: 3 news outlets

You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.

Article details
Title	How can we value what is not measured: the need for better data on women's health and primary care.
Published in	New Zealand Medical Journal, August 2026
DOI	10.26635/6965.7564
Pubmed ID	42659672
Authors	Fiona Imlach, Natalia Boven, Vanessa Selak

View on publisher site Alert me about new mentions

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2026.

All research outputs

#1,902,910

of 34,306,620 outputs

Outputs from New Zealand Medical Journal

#73

of 1,388 outputs

Outputs of similar age

#8,422

of 191,529 outputs

Outputs of similar age from New Zealand Medical Journal

of 8 outputs

Altmetric has tracked 34,306,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.

So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.

Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 191,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.

We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.