↓ Skip to main content

Improving annotation, access, and comparison of nutritional composition data for underutilized crops

Overview of attention for article published in Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, August 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
5 Bluesky users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Improving annotation, access, and comparison of nutritional composition data for underutilized crops
Published in
Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation, August 2026
DOI 10.1093/database/baag050
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 60%
Student > Master 2 40%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2026.
All research outputs
#11,334,713
of 34,347,532 outputs
Outputs from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#452
of 1,190 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,759
of 220,000 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Database: The Journal of Biological Databases & Curation
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,347,532 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,190 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,000 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.