↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effectiveness of adherence to lipid lowering therapy on LDL-cholesterol in patients with very high cardiovascular risk: A real-world evidence study in primary care
Published in
Atherosclerosis (00219150), May 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2017.05.018
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Despite management guidelines advocating statin/ezetimibe use in very high cardiovascular risk (CV) conditions, adherence to this therapy is still suboptimal and LDL-C target attainment unsatisfactory. We aimed to investigate the level of adherence to statin/ezetimibe and LDL-C target achievement rates in an unselected very high CV risk population in primary care setting in Italy. We performed a retrospective population-based study using the Health Search IMS Health Longitudinal Patient Database (HSD), including adult patients at very high CV risk, newly treated with statin, ezetimibe or their combination, with 3 and 6 months of follow-up. Although the large majority of patients had previous major CV events (99.9%), only 61% and 55.14% resulted adherent (Proportion of Days Covered, PDC≥80%) after 3 and 6 months, respectively. High adherence entailed almost a three times higher probability to reach the therapeutic LDL-C target (3 months: OR = 2.26 [95% [CI]: 1.88 to 2.72]; 6-months: OR = 2.74 [95% CI: 2.27 to 3.31]). The odds to treat to LDL-C target was greater for simvastatin-ezetimibe fixed combination, simvastatin, atorvastatin and rosuvastatin, in decreasing order. Finally, poor adherence was slightly more prevalent among patients treated with less effective statins, and at both low and maximal dosage regimens. This population-based study showed that adherence to statin therapy is poor even among patients who have already experienced a CV event. Failure to achieve recommended LDL-C levels appears imputable to the use of moderate doses and low to standard efficacy statins.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 108 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 11%
Researcher 11 10%
Other 10 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 8%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 40 37%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 15%
Social Sciences 4 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 3%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 44 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 August 2017.
All research outputs
#10,700,832
of 34,372,222 outputs
Outputs from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#2,788
of 7,135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,966
of 358,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Atherosclerosis (00219150)
#22
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,372,222 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.