↓ Skip to main content

A Taxometric Analysis of Psychopathic Personality

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Abnormal Psychology, November 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
wikipedia
7 Wikipedia pages

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Taxometric Analysis of Psychopathic Personality
Published in
Journal of Abnormal Psychology, November 2004
DOI 10.1037/0021-843x.113.4.626
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Although a common assumption throughout much of the professional and popular literature is that psychopaths are qualitatively different from others, very few studies have examined the latent structure of psychopathy. Whether psychopathy is a discrete category or a continuous dimension may have implications for research on the assessment, etiology, and treatment of this disorder. This study examined the latent structure of psychopathy in a sample of 309 jail and prison inmates. Three taxometric procedures were used to analyze indicators drawn from the Psychopathic Personality Inventory (S. O. Lilienfeld & B. P. Andrews, 1996), a self-report instrument. Consistent with prior studies that used other measures of psychopathy, none of the analyses was consistent with a taxonic solution, suggesting that psychopathic personality may be best understood as existing on a continuum.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Brazil 3 2%
Portugal 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 150 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 18%
Student > Master 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Researcher 15 9%
Professor 11 7%
Other 38 23%
Unknown 26 16%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 104 64%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 7 4%
Unknown 35 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,901,822
of 27,780,120 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Abnormal Psychology
#250
of 986 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,796
of 83,073 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Abnormal Psychology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,780,120 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 986 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,073 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them