↓ Skip to main content

Circuit Training and Protein Supplementation in Persons with Chronic Tetraplegia

Overview of attention for article published in Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Readers on

mendeley
177 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circuit Training and Protein Supplementation in Persons with Chronic Tetraplegia
Published in
Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise, July 2014
DOI 10.1249/mss.0000000000000250
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Circuit resistance training (CRT) performed three times weekly for 40-45 minutes each session increases muscular strength, and both aerobic and anaerobic capacity in untrained individuals with chronic paraplegia. Whether similar CRT is also effective for conditioning of persons with chronic tetraplegia is unknown. In addition, protein supplementation (PS) prior to, and immediately post-exercise has been shown to enhance exercise adaptations.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 177 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 176 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 29 16%
Student > Master 26 15%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 28 16%
Unknown 59 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Other 16 9%
Unknown 63 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2014.
All research outputs
#10,095,082
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#4,396
of 8,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,141
of 275,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Medicine and Science in Sports & Exercise
#47
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,578 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.3. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.