↓ Skip to main content

How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Letters, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology
Published in
FEMS Microbiology Letters, January 2014
DOI 10.1111/1574-6968.12375
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 6%
France 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
Sweden 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 73 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 24%
Student > Master 16 19%
Researcher 15 18%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Other 15 18%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 13%
Environmental Science 10 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 15 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#4,666,028
of 27,626,148 outputs
Outputs from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#606
of 6,019 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,007
of 331,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age from FEMS Microbiology Letters
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,626,148 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,019 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,380 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.