How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a matter of etymology

Overview of attention for article published in FEMS Microbiology Letters, January 2014

Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter: 17 X users

Readers on

mendeley: 85 Mendeley

So far, Altmetric has seen 20 X posts from 17 X users, with an upper bound of 86,089 followers.

@rob_beiko yes! It is really confusing, but I am standing actually on the #metabarcoding side ; ) But it's complicated. e.g. https://t.co/ZkpsnIQSCy

.@kejames @phylogenomics @hollybik @jennomics How many 16S studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? http://t.co/pFTvVrngsr

.@Mikey_Whitehead @hollybik Synonym #metagenetics is growing microbial field: http://t.co/AKvlE3hnIJ #BESSfe #eukhits #eDNA @Metabarcoding

metageneticsという表現はちょっと違う気がする。How many 16S-based studies should be included in a metagenomic conference? It may be a.. http://t.co/ch1WfWKBDU

This page shows the most recent X posts that mention this research output. Click here to find out how to access more activity, including 16 additional X posts.