↓ Skip to main content

When does spousal social control provoke negative reactions in the context of chronic illness? The pivotal role of patients’ expectations

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
When does spousal social control provoke negative reactions in the context of chronic illness? The pivotal role of patients’ expectations
Published in
Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, February 2011
DOI 10.1177/0265407510391335
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Spouses often monitor and seek to alter each other's health behavior, but such social control attempts can provoke behavioral resistance and emotional distress. Expectations regarding spouses' roles in their partners' health may influence reactions to spousal social control, with resistance and hostility less likely to occur among people who believe spouses should be involved in their partners' health. Evidence consistent with this idea emerged in a study of 191 patients with type 2 diabetes. Patients with greater expectations for spousal involvement (particularly females) generally reacted less negatively to spousal control. The findings help to clarify when people with a chronic illness are likely to resist and resent, rather than appreciate, spousal control.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Chile 1 2%
Unknown 51 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 23%
Student > Master 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 10 19%
Unknown 10 19%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 19 37%
Social Sciences 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 4%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2014.
All research outputs
#20,764,476
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
#1,492
of 1,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,925
of 121,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Social and Personal Relationships
#8
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,783 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.1. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,131 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.