↓ Skip to main content

Peripherally inserted central catheters optimize nutrient intake in moderately preterm infants

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Research, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Peripherally inserted central catheters optimize nutrient intake in moderately preterm infants
Published in
Pediatric Research, April 2016
DOI 10.1038/pr.2016.73
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

While very preterm (<32 weeks gestation) infants are routinely provided intensive nutritional support via central line, clinical practice varies for nutrient delivery in infants born moderately preterm (32 to 34 weeks gestation). We sought to define the impact of nutritional support via peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) on nutrient delivery in the first two weeks of life and growth by discharge. Data were extracted from the records of 187 infants born between 32 and 34 6/7 weeks gestation and admitted to the University of Iowa Children's Hospital between April 2012 and December 2013. Records of all feedings, weights, and PICC placements were collected. The growth outcomes at discharge for infants who received nutrition via PICC were compared to those who did not. In the first week of life, newborns who received nutrition via PICC line received 17.6 more kilocalories (CI 12.5-22.7, p<0.001) and 1.2 more grams protein per kilogram body weight per day (CI 0.9-1.4, p<0.001) compared to control infants. By discharge, the PICC group had gained 302 grams more body weight (p<0.001). This study demonstrates superior nutrient intake and growth in the first two weeks of life for infants who received nutrition via PICC line.Pediatric Research (2016); doi:10.1038/pr.2016.73.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Student > Master 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Other 5 15%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 21%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#20,421,487
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Research
#4,562
of 5,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,585
of 301,237 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Research
#42
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,105 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 301,237 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.