↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
High Intensity Interval Training in a Real World Setting: A Randomized Controlled Feasibility Study in Overweight Inactive Adults, Measuring Change in Maximal Oxygen Uptake
Published in
PLOS ONE, January 2014
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0083256
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

In research clinic settings, overweight adults undertaking HIIT (high intensity interval training) improve their fitness as effectively as those undertaking conventional walking programs but can do so within a shorter time spent exercising. We undertook a randomized controlled feasibility (pilot) study aimed at extending HIIT into a real world setting by recruiting overweight/obese, inactive adults into a group based activity program, held in a community park.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Brazil 4 1%
Portugal 3 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 384 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 69 17%
Student > Master 64 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 10%
Researcher 24 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 22 6%
Other 63 16%
Unknown 115 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 114 29%
Medicine and Dentistry 55 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 4%
Psychology 14 4%
Other 40 10%
Unknown 129 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2026.
All research outputs
#1,453,358
of 34,410,798 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#16,704
of 224,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,427
of 373,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#445
of 5,880 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,798 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 224,657 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,880 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.