↓ Skip to main content

Advancing Risk Stratification, Imaging, and Perioperative Decision-Making in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia

Overview of attention for article published in Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Advancing Risk Stratification, Imaging, and Perioperative Decision-Making in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
Published in
Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/10892532261477978
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 September 2026.
All research outputs
#23,884,685
of 34,321,056 outputs
Outputs from Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#211
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,760
of 185,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,321,056 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them