↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Mutated IGHV4-34 Receptors: Shared and Distinct Immunogenetic Features and Clinical Outcomes

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia with Mutated IGHV4-34 Receptors: Shared and Distinct Immunogenetic Features and Clinical Outcomes
Published in
Clinical Cancer Research, August 2017
DOI 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-16-3100
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aliki Xochelli, Panagiotis Baliakas, Ioannis Kavakiotis, Andreas Agathangelidis, Lesley-Ann Sutton, Eva Minga, Stavroula Ntoufa, Eugen Tausch, Xiao-Jie Yan, Tait Shanafelt, Karla Plevova, Myriam Boudjogra, Davide Rossi, Zadie Davis, Alba Navarro, Yorick Sandberg, Fie Juhl Vojdeman, Lydia Scarfo, Niki Stavroyianni, Andrey Sudarikov, Silvio Veronese, Tatiana Tzenou, Teodora Karan-Djurasevic, Mark Catherwood, Dirk Kienle, Maria Chatzouli, Monica Facco, Jasmin Bahlo, Christiane Pott, Lone Bredo Pedersen, Larry Mansouri, Karin E. Smedby, Charles C. Chu, Véronique Giudicelli, Marie-Paule Lefranc, Panagiotis Panagiotidis, Gunnar Juliusson, Achilles Anagnostopoulos, Ioannis Vlahavas, Darko Antic, Livio Trentin, Marco Montillo, Carsten Niemann, Hartmut Döhner, Anton W. Langerak, Sarka Pospisilova, Michael Hallek, Elias Campo, Nicholas Chiorazzi, Nikos Maglaveras, David Oscier, Gianluca Gaidano, Diane F. Jelinek, Stephan Stilgenbauer, Ioanna Chouvarda, Nikos Darzentas, Chrysoula Belessi, Frederic Davi, Anastasia Hadzidimitriou, Richard Rosenquist, Paolo Ghia, Kostas Stamatopoulos

Abstract

We sought to investigate if B cell receptor immunoglobulin (BcR IG) stereotypy is associated with particular clinicobiological features amongst chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients expressing mutated BcR IG (M-CLL) encoded by the IGHV4-34 gene, and also ascertain whether these associations could refine prognostication.<br /> <p>Experimental Design: In a series of 19,907 CLL cases with available immunogenetic information, we identified 339 IGHV4-34 expressing cases assigned to one of the four largest stereotyped M-CLL subsets, namely subsets #4, #16, #29 and #201, and investigated in detail their clinicobiological characteristics and disease outcomes.</p> Results:We identified shared and subset-specific patterns of somatic hypermutation (SHM) amongst patients assigned to these subsets. The greatest similarity was observed between subsets #4 and #16, both including IgG-switched cases (IgG-CLL). In contrast, the least similarity was detected between subsets #16 and #201, the latter concerning IgM/D-expressing CLLs. Significant differences between subsets also involved disease stage at diagnosis and the presence of specific genomic aberrations. IgG subsets #4 and #16 emerged as particularly indolent with a significantly (p<0.05) longer time-to-first-treatment (TTFT) (median TTFT: not yet reached) compared to the IgM/D subsets #29 and #201 (median TTFT: 11 and 12 years, respectively).<br /><br />Conclusions:Our findings support the notion that BcR IG stereotypy further refines prognostication in CLL, superseding the immunogenetic distinction based solely on SHM load. Additionally, the observed distinct genetic aberration landscapes and clinical heterogeneity suggests that not all M-CLL cases are equal, prompting further research into the underlying biological background with the ultimate aim of tailored patient management.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 19%
Professor 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Other 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 14 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 19%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 15 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,459,782
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Cancer Research
#10,538
of 12,638 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,292
of 316,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Cancer Research
#195
of 244 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,638 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,300 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 244 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.