↓ Skip to main content

Thin Layer Coulometry Based on Ion-Exchanger Membranes for Heparin Detection in Undiluted Human Blood

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical Chemistry, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Thin Layer Coulometry Based on Ion-Exchanger Membranes for Heparin Detection in Undiluted Human Blood
Published in
Analytical Chemistry, January 2014
DOI 10.1021/ac403902f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

We explore here for the first time a potentially calibration-free methodology for the detection of protamine (and, by titration, heparin) in undiluted human blood in the therapeutic concentration range from 20 to 120 mg L(-1). The use of a thin layer sample (5.8 μL) confined between a tubular protamine selective membrane (inner diameter, 600 μm) and a Ag/AgCl wire (diameter 400 μm) achieves an exhaustive depletion from the sample. Coulometry detection was chosen for the interrogation of the thin layer, employing a double pulse technique with 120 s for each pulse. Protamine calibration curves were recorded at physiological concentrations and in undiluted human blood. A linear relationship was obtained in both cases, but a diminished sensitivity was observed in contact with blood, which is explained with a partial passivation of the inner Ag/AgCl element. Heparin-protamine titrations were performed in undiluted human blood samples, mimicking the final application with patients undergoing critical care. The observed values correlate satisfactorily with those of an alternative technique, so-called flash-chronopotentiometry on planar membranes.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 20%
Student > Master 3 10%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Other 5 17%
Unknown 6 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 13 43%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Unspecified 1 3%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 10 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,360,179
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Analytical Chemistry
#22,272
of 26,401 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,624
of 306,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical Chemistry
#220
of 317 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 26,401 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 317 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.