↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cost-efficient filtration and replication strategies match or exceed detection sensitivity for marine eDNA diversity at an intertidal site under a standardized laboratory workflow
Published in
PLOS ONE, September 2026
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0350111
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 20%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Unspecified 1 20%
Environmental Science 1 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 September 2026.
All research outputs
#23,124,171
of 34,581,411 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#140,807
of 225,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#91,568
of 296,947 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#268
of 685 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,581,411 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,128 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,947 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 685 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.