↓ Skip to main content

Substructural damage identification in a digital twin framework using heterogeneous response reconstruction

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Structural Engineering, March 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 136)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Substructural damage identification in a digital twin framework using heterogeneous response reconstruction
Published in
Advances in Structural Engineering, March 2024
DOI 10.1177/13694332241242984
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2026.
All research outputs
#12,322,232
of 34,339,954 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Structural Engineering
#14
of 136 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#133,412
of 379,435 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Structural Engineering
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,339,954 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 136 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.8. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 379,435 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them