James S Albert, Kevin T Torgersen, Brandon T Waltz, Maxwell J Bernt, Paulo R A M Affonso, Alexandre Antonelli, Jonathan W Armbruster, Ricardo C Benine, Jamille A Bitencourt, Paulo A Buckup, Bárbara B Calegari, Tiago P Carvalho, Prosanta Chakrabarty, Vanessa Correa-Roldán, Jack M Craig, William G R Crampton, Fernando C P Dagosta, Carlos DoNascimiento, Kory M Evans, Fernando C Jerep, Sven O Kullander, Hernán López-Fernández, Nathan R Lovejoy, Luiz R Malabarba, Wilfredo A Matamoros, Caleb D McMahan, Bruno F Melo, Jorge E García-Melo, André L Neto-Ferreira, Claudio Oliveira, Hernán Ortega, Michael J Pauers, Carla S Pavanelli, Edson H L Pereira, Mário C C de Pinna, Francisco Provenzano, Robson T C Ramos, Roberto E Reis, Fábio F Roxo, Oscar A Shibatta, Brian L Sidlauskas, Gabriel S C Silva, William Leo Smith, Victor A Tagliacollo, Milton Tan, Alexander Zizka, Kirk O Winemiller
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2026.
All research outputs
#4,514,116
of 34,453,422 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Biology
#519
of 2,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,225
of 238,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Biology
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,453,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,146 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
