↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Incidence of and risk factors for hospitalisations due to vascular complications: A population-based type 1 diabetes cohort (n=1316) followed into early adulthood
Published in
Journal of Diabetes & its Complications, January 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2016.11.022
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To determine the incidence of hospitalisations and risk factors for vascular complications experienced during early adulthood in patients with childhood onset type 1 diabetes. A population-based childhood onset type 1 diabetes cohort was identified from a statewide register (1992-2012). Data linkage was used to identify a matched comparison cohort. Hospital admissions data were extracted to follow up both cohorts into early adulthood (1975-2012). The type 1 diabetes cohort (n=1316) had a mean age of diagnosis of 9.5years, 49.5% were women and mean age at the end of follow-up was 26.3years (range 18-38). Within the type 1 diabetes cohort 32 (2.4%) were hospitalised with a vascular complication during early adulthood. Poor glycaemic control during paediatric management was associated with a significant increase in risk for ophthalmic complication with 19.4% (n=12/62) of those with a mean HbA1c >12% (108mmol/mol) diagnosed compared to 0.72% (n=5/696) of those with mean HbA1c <9% (75mmol/mol), adjusted hazard ratio 8.4 (95% CI 2.0, 34.7). Severe vascular complications requiring hospital admission continue to be observed during early adulthood. Both women and those with poor glycaemic control are at increased risk of requiring a hospital admission for these complications during early adulthood.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 54 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 9%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 6 11%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Social Sciences 3 6%
Psychology 2 4%
Philosophy 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 28 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2013.
All research outputs
#12,358,651
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Diabetes & its Complications
#692
of 1,644 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#169,861
of 466,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Diabetes & its Complications
#14
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,644 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 466,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.