↓ Skip to main content

Hierarchical feature binding in a spiking neural network model of the primate ventral visual pathway

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS Computational Biology, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

bluesky
6 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hierarchical feature binding in a spiking neural network model of the primate ventral visual pathway
Published in
PLoS Computational Biology, September 2026
DOI 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1014752
Pubmed ID
Authors

Brian Gardner, Patrick T. McCarthy, Joseph Chrol-Cannon, Dan F. M. Goodman, Simon R. Schultz, Giovanni Lo Iacono, Simon M. Stringer

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 September 2026.
All research outputs
#11,176,656
of 34,404,538 outputs
Outputs from PLoS Computational Biology
#5,883
of 10,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,187
of 185,987 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS Computational Biology
#19
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,404,538 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.8. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 185,987 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.