↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Review Essay : Historical Demography in East Asia Population, Disease and Land in Early Japan, 645-900 William Wayne Farris Cambridge, Mass.: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, and the Harvard-Yenching Institute, distributed by Harvard University Press, 1985. 235 pp. Family and Population in East Asian History Edited by Susan B. Hanley and Arthur P. Wolf Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1985. 360 pp
Published in
Journal of Family History, December 1986
DOI 10.1177/036319908601100406
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2026.
All research outputs
#12,344,283
of 34,360,889 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Family History
#101
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,861
of 60,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Family History
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,889 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them