↓ Skip to main content

The aesthetics of feminist thinking: Methods, forms, desire

Overview of attention for article published in Feminist Theory, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The aesthetics of feminist thinking: Methods, forms, desire
Published in
Feminist Theory, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/14647001261488724
Authors

Gayle Wald, Samantha Pinto

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2026.
All research outputs
#9,604,841
of 34,387,656 outputs
Outputs from Feminist Theory
#153
of 429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,153
of 155,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Feminist Theory
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,387,656 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them