↓ Skip to main content

Innovations in Prosthetic Interfaces for the Upper Extremity

Overview of attention for article published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, December 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Innovations in Prosthetic Interfaces for the Upper Extremity
Published in
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, December 2013
DOI 10.1097/prs.0b013e3182a97e5f
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Advancements in modern robotic technology have led to the development of highly sophisticated upper extremity prosthetic limbs. High-fidelity volitional control of these devices is dependent on the critical interface between the patient and the mechanical prosthesis. Recent innovations in prosthetic interfaces have focused on several control strategies. Targeted muscle reinnervation is currently the most immediately applicable prosthetic control strategy and is particularly indicated in proximal upper extremity amputations. Investigation into various brain interfaces has allowed acquisition of neuroelectric signals directly or indirectly from the central nervous system for prosthetic control. Peripheral nerve interfaces permit signal transduction from both motor and sensory nerves with a higher degree of selectivity. This article reviews the current developments in each of these interface systems and discusses the potential of these approaches to facilitate motor control and sensory feedback in upper extremity neuroprosthetic devices.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 131 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 17%
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Other 12 9%
Researcher 12 9%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 38 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 45 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 5%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 6 4%
Unknown 40 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2018.
All research outputs
#9,102,960
of 27,376,552 outputs
Outputs from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#4,053
of 10,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,493
of 329,282 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
#52
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,376,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,282 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.