↓ Skip to main content

Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair

Overview of attention for article published in Video Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Patient-Specific Instrumentation for Medial Opening Wedge High Tibial Osteotomy With Concomitant Medial Meniscal Root Repair
Published in
Video Journal of Sports Medicine, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/26350254261466712
Authors

Robert E. Bilodeau, Romed P. Vieider, Jacob Hartline, Karina Dias, Joseph Euringer, Jonathan D. Hughes

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2026.
All research outputs
#23,963,713
of 34,394,092 outputs
Outputs from Video Journal of Sports Medicine
#177
of 289 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,960
of 156,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Video Journal of Sports Medicine
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,394,092 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 289 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,489 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them