↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
10 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
558 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effect of a multifactorial, interdisciplinary intervention on risk factors for falls and fall rate in frail older people: a randomised controlled trial
Published in
Age & Ageing, December 2013
DOI 10.1093/ageing/aft204
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Background: frail older people have a high risk of falling.Objective: assess the effect of a frailty intervention on risk factors for falls and fall rates in frail older people.Design: randomised controlled trial.Participants: 241 community-dwelling people aged 70+ without severe cognitive impairment who met the Cardiovascular Health Study frailty definition.Intervention: multifactorial, interdisciplinary intervention targeting frailty characteristics with an individualised home exercise programme prescribed in 10 home visits from a physiotherapist and interdisciplinary management of medical, psychological and social problems.Measurements: risk factors for falls were measured using the Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA) and mobility measures at 12 months by a blinded assessor. Falls were monitored with calendars.Results: participants had a mean (SD) age of 83.3 (5.9) years, 68% were women and 216 (90%) completed the study. After 12 months the intervention group had significantly better performance than the control group, after controlling for baseline values, in the PPA components of quadriceps strength (between-group difference 1.84 kg, 95% CI 0.17-3.51, P = 0.03) and body sway (-90.63 mm, 95% CI -168.6 to -12.6, P = 0.02), short physical performance battery (1.58, 95% CI 1.02-2.14, P ≤ 0.001) and 4 m walk (0.06 m/s 95% CI 0.01-0.10, P = 0.02) with a trend toward a better total PPA score (-0.40, 95% CI -0.83-0.04, P = 0.07) but no difference in fall rates (incidence rate ratio 1.12, 95% CI 0.78-1.63, P = 0.53).Conclusion: the intervention improved performance on risk factors for falls but did not reduce the rate of falls.Trial registration: ACTRN12608000250336.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 558 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 554 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 79 14%
Student > Bachelor 70 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 10%
Researcher 49 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 115 21%
Unknown 160 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 117 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 111 20%
Sports and Recreations 36 6%
Social Sciences 21 4%
Psychology 17 3%
Other 67 12%
Unknown 189 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 March 2026.
All research outputs
#2,249,850
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Age & Ageing
#869
of 4,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,247
of 373,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Age & Ageing
#10
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,664 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 373,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.