↓ Skip to main content

A randomised controlled trial to compare minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices to conventional monitoring in the management of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (MITRE)

Overview of attention for article published in Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., May 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
1 X user
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A randomised controlled trial to compare minimally invasive glucose monitoring devices to conventional monitoring in the management of insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (MITRE)
Published in
Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme., May 2009
DOI 10.3310/hta13280
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Greece 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 31 21%
Student > Master 18 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 10 7%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 35 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 43 30%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 5%
Engineering 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Other 26 18%
Unknown 37 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,349,738
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#844
of 1,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,165
of 149,800 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health technology assessment : HTA / NHS R & D HTA Programme.
#8
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 149,800 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.