↓ Skip to main content

AGRICULTURAL PONDS SUPPORT AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS

Overview of attention for article published in Ecological Applications, June 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources

Citations

dimensions_citation
264 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
396 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AGRICULTURAL PONDS SUPPORT AMPHIBIAN POPULATIONS
Published in
Ecological Applications, June 2004
DOI 10.1890/02-5305
Authors

Melinda G. Knutson, William B. Richardson, David M. Reineke, Brian R. Gray, Jeffrey R. Parmelee, Shawn E. Weick

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 396 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 3%
United States 8 2%
Australia 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 365 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 85 21%
Student > Master 59 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 14%
Student > Bachelor 37 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 8%
Other 68 17%
Unknown 62 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 212 54%
Environmental Science 90 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 2%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 76 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2013.
All research outputs
#5,629,250
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#1,367
of 3,531 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,416
of 64,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#3
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,531 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 64,602 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.