↓ Skip to main content

A Case of a Eustachian Tube Hairy Polyp Misdiagnosed as an Adenoid Residual in a Child.

Overview of attention for article published in Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A Case of a Eustachian Tube Hairy Polyp Misdiagnosed as an Adenoid Residual in a Child.
Published in
Ear, Nose & Throat Journal, April 2024
DOI 10.1177/01455613241244667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yi Liu, Tian Wen Yang, Yi Lin Long, Wen Bo Xu, Li Wen Tang, Chun Lei Li

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 September 2026.
All research outputs
#6,774,888
of 34,399,888 outputs
Outputs from Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
#153
of 2,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,054
of 380,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ear, Nose & Throat Journal
#2
of 103 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,399,888 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 380,100 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 103 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.