↓ Skip to main content

Bluelining in Red Hot Fire Zones: Fintech and Traditional Mortgage Lending in California’s Wildfire Risk Zones

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
bluesky
4 Bluesky users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Bluelining in Red Hot Fire Zones: Fintech and Traditional Mortgage Lending in California’s Wildfire Risk Zones
Published in
Journal of Planning Education and Research, September 2026
DOI 10.1177/0739456x261482067
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 October 2026.
All research outputs
#3,511,300
of 34,570,332 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Planning Education and Research
#126
of 881 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,876
of 231,002 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Planning Education and Research
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,570,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 881 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,002 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them