↓ Skip to main content

Judicious use of latent profile analysis in supportive care: the distinction between mono- and multi-construct applications

Overview of attention for article published in Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2026
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Judicious use of latent profile analysis in supportive care: the distinction between mono- and multi-construct applications
Published in
Supportive Care in Cancer, September 2026
DOI 10.1007/s00520-026-11226-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Derek K. Smith, Loren E. Smith

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2026.
All research outputs
#9,609,775
of 34,410,252 outputs
Outputs from Supportive Care in Cancer
#2,244
of 6,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,649
of 158,098 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Supportive Care in Cancer
#22
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,252 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,939 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,098 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.