↓ Skip to main content

Openness to the Unknown

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophy of the Social Sciences, March 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Openness to the Unknown
Published in
Philosophy of the Social Sciences, March 2003
DOI 10.1177/0048393102250307
Authors

Yasuyuki Kageyama

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2026.
All research outputs
#12,359,604
of 34,413,214 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy of the Social Sciences
#105
of 356 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,274
of 89,713 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy of the Social Sciences
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,413,214 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 356 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 89,713 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them