↓ Skip to main content

Effects of a 4-Week Youth Baseball Conditioning Program on Throwing Velocity

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Effects of a 4-Week Youth Baseball Conditioning Program on Throwing Velocity
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, December 2010
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0b013e3181db9f59
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Effects of a 4-week youth baseball conditioning program on throwing velocity. This study examined the effects of a 4-week youth baseball conditioning program on maximum throwing velocity. Thirty-four youth baseball players (11-15 years of age) were randomly and equally divided into control and training groups. The training group performed 3 sessions (each 75 minutes) weekly for 4 weeks, which comprised a sport specific warm-up, resistance training with elastic tubing, a throwing program, and stretching. Throwing velocity was assessed initially and at the end of the 4-week conditioning program for both control and training groups. The level of significance used was p < 0.05. After the 4-week conditioning program, throwing velocity increased significantly (from 25.1 ± 2.8 to 26.1 ± 2.8 m·s) in the training group but did not significantly increase in the control group (from 24.2 ± 3.6 to 24.0 ± 3.9 m·s). These results demonstrate that the short-term 4-week baseball conditioning program was effective in increasing throwing velocity in youth baseball players. Increased throwing velocity may be helpful for pitchers (less time for hitters to swing) and position players (decreased time for a runner to advance to the next base).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 145 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 19%
Student > Bachelor 22 15%
Researcher 15 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Other 25 17%
Unknown 36 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 40 27%
Medicine and Dentistry 31 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 7 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 46 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2014.
All research outputs
#28,603,920
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#6,691
of 7,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,857
of 254,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#68
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,306 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.